Traceability

Characteristic Name:	Traceability
Dimension:	Reliability and Credibility
Description:	The lineage of the data is verifiable
Granularity:	Record
Implementation Type:	Process-based approach
Characteristic Type:	Usage

Verification Metric:

The number of tasks failed or under performed due to lack of traceability in data

The number of complaints received due to lack of traceability in data

GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons

The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation

Guidelines:	Scenario:
Maintain provenance records for the events such as creation, update,transcription, abstraction, validation and transforming ownership, if the data are dynamic.	(1) Inventory system shows the current stocks and keep records for all the transactions that the stocks are subjected to
In case of multiple sources are available for same data/information, implement a traceability mechanism to view all versions from multiple sources	(1) Content management systems
Maintain proper protocols/standards/policy to archive data	(1) Every invoice is archived after 120 days of payments.
Maintain versions of data records where necessary	(1) Customer versions

Validation Metric:

How mature is the process to maintain traceability in data

These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.

Example:	Source:
minutes of a meeting will be produced in draft form and reviewed by the members of the committee before being approved. Once this process of creation is ﬁnished the record must be ﬁxed and must not be susceptible to change. If a record is changed or manipulated in some way, it no longer provides evidence of the transaction it originally documented. For example, if someone alters the minutes of a meeting after they have been approved, the minutes can no longer be considered an accurate record of the meeting. This is another issue that becomes more important in an electronic context.	K. Smith, “Public Sector Records Management: A Practical Guide”, Ashgate, 2007.

Example:

Source:

minutes of a meeting will be produced in draft form and reviewed by the members of the committee before being approved. Once this process of creation is ﬁnished the record must be ﬁxed and must not be susceptible to change. If a record is changed or manipulated in some way, it no longer provides evidence of the transaction it originally documented. For example, if someone alters the minutes of a meeting after they have been approved, the minutes can no longer be considered an accurate record of the meeting. This is another issue that becomes more important in an electronic context.

K. Smith, “Public Sector Records Management: A Practical Guide”, Ashgate, 2007.

The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.

Definition:	Source:
Is the background of the information visible (author, date etc.)?	EPPLER, M. J. 2006. Managing information quality: increasing the value of information in knowledge-intensive products and processes, Springer.
A data provanance record can include information about creation, update, transcription, abstraction, validation and transforming ownership of data.	ISO 2012. ISO 8000-2 Data Quality-Part 2-Vocabulary. ISO.
The extent to which the correctness of information is verifiable or provable in the context of a particular activity.	STVILIA, B., GASSER, L., TWIDALE, M. B. & SMITH, L. C. 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1720-1733.

Format consistency

Characteristic Name:	Format consistency
Dimension:	Consistency
Description:	Data formats are consistently used
Granularity:	Element
Implementation Type:	Rule-based approach
Characteristic Type:	Declarative

Verification Metric:

The number of inconsistent data formats reported in an attribute per thousand records

GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons

The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation

Guidelines:	Scenario:
Maintain consistent formats for data values across different data bases and different tables in the same database.	(1) Telephone number : Country code/Area code/number (2) Address : House number, Street, Suburb, Sate, Country
Maintain structural similarity or compatibility of entities and attributes across systems (databases/data sets) and across time.	(1) Customer record has the same structure in all systems which it is being used.
Maintain consistent and compatible encoding /decoding standards across different applications.	(1) ASCII, UTF-8, XML

Validation Metric:

How mature is the creation and implementation of the DQ rules to maintain format consistency

These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.

Example:	Source:
1) Each class in a UK secondary school is allocated a class identifier; this consists of the 3 initials of the teacher plus a two digit year group number of the class. It is declared as AAA99 (3 Alpha characters and two numeric characters). 2) A new year 9 teacher, Sally Hearn (without a middle name) is appointed therefore there are only two initials. A decision must be made as to how to represent two initials or the rule will fail and the database will reject the class identifier of “SH09”. It is decided that an additional character “Z” will be added to pad the letters to 3: “SZH09”, however this could break the accuracy rule. A better solution would be to amend the database to accept 2 or 3 initials and 1 or 2 numbers. 3) In this scenario, the parent, a US Citizen, applying to a European school completes the Date of Birth (D.O.B) on the application form in the US date format, MM/DD/YYYY rather than the European DD/MM/YYYY format, causing the representation of days and months to be reversed.	N. Askham, et al., “The Six Primary Dimensions for Data Quality Assessment: Defining Data Quality Dimensions”, DAMA UK Working Group, 2013.
if a data element is used to store the color of a person’s eyes, a value of TRUCK is invalid. A value of BROWN for my eye color would be valid but inaccurate, in that my real eye color is blue.	J. E. Olson, “Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 9 January 2003.

Example:

Source:

1) Each class in a UK secondary school is allocated a class identifier; this consists of the 3 initials of the teacher plus a two digit year group number of the class. It is declared as AAA99 (3 Alpha characters and two numeric characters).

2) A new year 9 teacher, Sally Hearn (without a middle name) is appointed therefore there are only two initials. A decision must be made as to how to represent two initials or the rule will fail and the database will reject the class identifier of “SH09”. It is decided that an additional character “Z” will be added to pad the letters to 3: “SZH09”, however this could break the accuracy rule. A better solution would be to amend the database to accept 2 or 3 initials and 1 or 2 numbers.

3) In this scenario, the parent, a US Citizen, applying to a European school completes the Date of Birth (D.O.B) on the application form in the US date format, MM/DD/YYYY rather than the European DD/MM/YYYY format, causing the representation of days and months to be reversed.

N. Askham, et al., “The Six Primary Dimensions for Data Quality Assessment: Defining Data Quality Dimensions”, DAMA UK Working Group, 2013.

if a data element is used to store the color of a person’s eyes, a value of TRUCK is invalid. A value of BROWN for my eye color would be valid but inaccurate, in that my real eye color is blue.

J. E. Olson, “Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 9 January 2003.

The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.

Definition:	Source:
A measure of the equivalence of information stored or used in various data stores, applications, and systems, and the processes for making data equivalent	D. McGilvray, “Executing Data Quality Projects: Ten Steps to Quality Data and Trusted Information”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2008.
The extent to which similar attributes or elements of an information object are consistently represented using the same structure, format, and precision.	STVILIA, B., GASSER, L., TWIDALE, M. B. & SMITH, L. C. 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1720-1733.